FIVA vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index while FNDF tracks the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.50%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for FNDF. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIVA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

FIVA vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return.

FIVA

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 35.97%
• 3Y*: 22.76%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 21.21%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: 24.10%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	12.92%	45.83%	2.53%	20.38%	-10.37%	15.90%	-1.78%	19.78%	-19.20%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	21.21%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FNDF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018	0.93

The correlation between FIVA and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIVA	FNDF
Financial Services	25.5%	16.7%
Industrials	19.3%	15.9%
Technology	11.4%	11.1%
Healthcare	8.6%	5.5%
Basic Materials	7.8%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	10.7%
Energy	6.1%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	6.9%
Utilities	3.9%	3.8%
Communication Services	3.2%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.9%

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 67
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.99	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.89	-0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.53	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	4.24	-1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	16.19	-4.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIVA vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.99	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.83	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.54	-0.05

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-40.14%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-10.60%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-13.89%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-25.56%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.67%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.78%	-7.64%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.77%	+0.22%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	5.26%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	12.53%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	15.06%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	16.18%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.90%	17.67%	+0.23%

FIVA vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVA vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.52%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FIVA and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIVA or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to FIVA (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or FNDF?

On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 13.35% vs 12.50% for FIVA. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or FNDF?

Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.

What is the main difference between FIVA and FNDF?

FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while FNDF tracks Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.