FIVA vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
FIVA and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FIVA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both FIVA and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIVA or FNDF.
Performance
FIVA vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than FNDF's 4.38% return.
FIVA
4.76%
-3.12%
-2.53%
10.45%
5.83%
N/A
FNDF
4.38%
-3.11%
-1.57%
10.21%
7.28%
5.41%
Key characteristics
| FIVA | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 0.82 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.96 | 3.80 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.62% | 2.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.78% | 12.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.76% | -40.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.39% | -7.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIVA vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and FNDF is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIVA vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIVA vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than FNDF's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.12% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIVA vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.