FIVA vs. FNDF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity International Value Factor Index while FNDF tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 14.04%/yr vs 14.10%/yr for FNDF. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIVA charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

FIVA vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.34% return.

FIVA

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 2.60%
• 6M: 9.51%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 1Y: 39.96%
• 3Y*: 22.78%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.10%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.58%
• 6M: 11.58%
• YTD: 20.34%
• 1Y: 40.46%
• 3Y*: 22.54%
• 5Y*: 14.10%
• 10Y*: 11.76%
• ALL TIME*: 9.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	$2.99M	$3.02M	$3.13M
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	$75.53M	$72.26M	$76.64M

FIVA vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	17.54%	45.83%	2.53%	20.38%	-10.37%	15.90%	-1.78%	19.78%	-18.62%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.34%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FNDF is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.93

The correlation between FIVA and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIVA	FNDF
Financial Services	26.1%	20.2%
Industrials	17.9%	12.8%
Technology	15.8%	11.5%
Healthcare	8.3%	6.0%
Basic Materials	7.1%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	6.2%
Energy	4.8%	10.6%
Utilities	3.4%	4.3%
Communication Services	2.8%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.9%

Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA

FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 90
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 91
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.51	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.29	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.45	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	3.84	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.58	13.43	+0.15

FIVA vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.76%	-40.14%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-10.60%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	-13.89%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-25.56%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.38%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.65%	-7.59%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.02%	-0.07%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVA	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	4.42%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	14.19%	-0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	16.21%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	16.34%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	17.44%	+0.47%

FIVA vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIVA vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FNDF's 3.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF	2.57%	2.68%	3.52%	3.63%	3.62%	3.76%	2.46%	3.61%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	3.03%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVA and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FIVA and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIVA or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FIVA (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, FIVA or FNDF?

On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 14.10% vs 14.04% for FIVA. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIVA or FNDF?

Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 14.10% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIVA or FNDF?

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIVA or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 2.57% for FIVA.

What is the main difference between FIVA and FNDF?

FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FIVA and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.