PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.


FIVA

1D
-0.36%
1M
5.48%
YTD
12.92%
6M
18.20%
1Y
35.97%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVA vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
12.92%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-19.20%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and EFAV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

0.81

The correlation between FIVA and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
EFAV

Financial Services

25.5%
19.9%

Industrials

19.3%
15.1%

Technology

11.4%
4.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
12.4%

Basic Materials

7.8%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
5.2%

Energy

6.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
11.5%

Utilities

3.9%
9.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
9.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

FIVA
25.5%
EFAV
19.9%

Industrials

FIVA
19.3%
EFAV
15.1%

Technology

FIVA
11.4%
EFAV
4.5%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.6%
EFAV
12.4%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.8%
EFAV
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.8%
EFAV
5.2%

Energy

FIVA
6.1%
EFAV
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.6%
EFAV
11.5%

Utilities

FIVA
3.9%
EFAV
9.1%

Communication Services

FIVA
3.2%
EFAV
9.7%

Real Estate

FIVA
1.8%
EFAV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVA vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVAEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.17

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.46

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

4.10

+7.97

FIVA vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVAEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

0.92

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.53

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.05

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-27.56%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-6.46%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-8.75%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-27.46%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-5.61%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-4.77%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.30%

+0.69%

Volatility

FIVA vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVAEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

3.17%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

8.17%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

10.35%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

11.79%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

13.21%

+4.69%

FIVA vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVA vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.52%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVA and EFAV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVA has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.50% vs 6.17% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.

FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.20% for EFAV.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer