FIVA vs. EFAS
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIVA tracks the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index while EFAS tracks the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.50%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for EFAS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
FIVA vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIVA having a 12.92% return and EFAS slightly higher at 12.96%.
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FIVA vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -19.20% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 12.96% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -14.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and EFAS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FIVA and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIVA vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIVA
EFAS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FIVA
EFAS
Industrials
FIVA
EFAS
Technology
FIVA
EFAS
Healthcare
FIVA
EFAS
Basic Materials
FIVA
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
FIVA
EFAS
Energy
FIVA
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
FIVA
EFAS
Utilities
FIVA
EFAS
Communication Services
FIVA
EFAS
Real Estate
FIVA
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
EFAS
FIVA vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVA | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.73 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | 3.83 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 5.44 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 14.48 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVA | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.73 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.78 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -44.38% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -5.30% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -11.84% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -28.81% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -3.01% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -7.08% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 1.99% | +1.00% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.96%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 2.96% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 8.20% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 10.60% | +4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 15.59% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 18.33% | -0.43% |
FIVA vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIVA vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than EFAS's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 5.05% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVA and EFAS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIVA has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to EFAS (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.50% vs 12.04% for EFAS. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIVA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.
FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer