FID vs. CIBR
FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FID is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FID returned 7.74%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FID vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
FID vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | -18.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FID and CIBR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between FID and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FID vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FID
CIBR
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FID
CIBR
-
Utilities
FID
CIBR
-
Industrials
FID
CIBR
Communication Services
FID
CIBR
Real Estate
FID
CIBR
-
Energy
FID
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FID
CIBR
-
Technology
FID
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
FID
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
FID
CIBR
-
Healthcare
FID
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FID vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FID
CIBR
FID vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FID | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.18 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 2.79 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FID | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.06 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.66 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.67 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
FID vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FID | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -33.89% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -21.99% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.97% | -21.99% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -33.89% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.81% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -8.66% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 9.25% | -6.70% |
Volatility
FID vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FID | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 10.90% | -7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 20.90% | -12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 24.50% | -14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 24.95% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 23.60% | -4.64% |
FID vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FID and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FID vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FID and CIBR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs 7.74% for FID. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FID and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
FID is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FID and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer