FGETX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FGETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 17, 1998. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGETX Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M | -9.18% | 17.50% | 38.90% | 28.15% | -24.87% | 18.56% | 24.04% | 22.43% | -18.44% | 30.02% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGETX achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FGETX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FGETX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.59%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- 11.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGETX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGETX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGETX
FGIAX
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGETX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.75 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.26 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 2.61 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 12.12 | -9.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGETX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.75 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.80 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGETX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FGETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.63%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGETX Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M | 11.63% | 10.57% | 15.99% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 8.54% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 11.00% | 14.29% | 1.07% | 0.59% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGETX drawdown since its inception was -61.87%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGETX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGETX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.87% | -49.35% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -8.29% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.08% | -21.08% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.49% | -38.02% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.07% | -3.78% | -9.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -7.22% | -6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.78% | +1.66% |
Volatility
FGETX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FGETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGETX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.05% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 7.09% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 12.28% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 13.08% | +5.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 15.17% | +3.28% |