PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGETX vs. GIDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGETX achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than GIDGX's 11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FGETX has outperformed GIDGX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while GIDGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


FGETX

1D
0.47%
1M
6.38%
YTD
13.49%
6M
14.96%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
13.28%

GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGETX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M
13.49%17.50%38.90%28.15%-24.87%18.56%24.04%22.43%-18.44%30.02%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.66%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FGETX and GIDGX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.89

The correlation between FGETX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGETX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGETX
FGETX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FGETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGETX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FGETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGETX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGETXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.68

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

3.76

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.62

-1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.73

17.38

-7.64

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the GIDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGETX and GIDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGETXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.68

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.87

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.77

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.69

-0.29

Drawdowns

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGETX drawdown since its inception was -61.87%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGETX and GIDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGETXGIDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.87%

-31.63%

-30.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-7.14%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-14.69%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.08%

-20.39%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.49%

-31.63%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-3.87%

-9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.48%

+1.73%

Volatility

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 2.46%. This indicates that FGETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGETXGIDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

2.46%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

7.64%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

9.65%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

12.99%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

14.16%

+4.44%

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGETX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGETX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison

FGETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than GIDGX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGETX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M
9.31%10.57%15.99%6.61%0.00%8.54%0.00%0.20%11.00%14.29%1.07%0.59%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.53%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGETX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGETX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to GIDGX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGETX dropped -61.87% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.

GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGETX and GIDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer