PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGETX vs. SVTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGETX achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than SVTAX's 3.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FGETX has outperformed SVTAX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while SVTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.24% annualized return.


FGETX

1D
0.47%
1M
6.38%
YTD
13.49%
6M
14.96%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
13.28%

SVTAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.33%
6M
4.11%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGETX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M
13.49%17.50%38.90%28.15%-24.87%18.56%24.04%22.43%-18.44%30.02%
SVTAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
3.33%13.44%12.77%7.77%-7.80%18.18%-2.68%19.81%-6.47%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FGETX and SVTAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2006

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FGETX and SVTAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGETX vs. SVTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGETX
FGETX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FGETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGETX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FGETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGETX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SVTAX
SVTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SVTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SVTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGETXSVTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.03

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

3.24

+6.49

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the SVTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGETX and SVTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGETXSVTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

0.86

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.69

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.59

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.50

-0.10

Drawdowns

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGETX drawdown since its inception was -61.87%, which is greater than SVTAX's maximum drawdown of -43.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGETX and SVTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGETXSVTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.87%

-43.81%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-5.99%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-10.37%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.08%

-16.52%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.49%

-31.02%

-2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.86%

+2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-8.06%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.91%

+1.30%

Volatility

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M (FGETX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund (SVTAX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FGETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGETXSVTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

1.66%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

5.10%

+8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

7.21%

+9.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

10.61%

+8.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

12.28%

+6.32%

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGETX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SVTAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGETX vs. SVTAX - Dividend Comparison

FGETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than SVTAX's 8.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGETX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class M
9.31%10.57%15.99%6.61%0.00%8.54%0.00%0.20%11.00%14.29%1.07%0.59%
SVTAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.48%8.77%8.68%5.76%10.62%11.81%1.00%5.39%10.70%7.90%5.97%6.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGETX and SVTAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGETX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SVTAX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGETX dropped -61.87% vs SVTAX's -43.81%.

FGETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGETX and SVTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer