PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSM vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSM vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 21.69% return, which is significantly higher than SPSM's 19.33% return.


FFSM

1D
-1.51%
1M
4.83%
YTD
21.69%
6M
18.97%
1Y
40.76%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

SPSM

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.27%
YTD
19.33%
6M
16.91%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSM vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
21.69%14.89%14.38%17.30%-16.35%20.44%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
19.33%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%16.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and SPSM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FFSM and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFSM vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFSM
SPSM

Industrials

29.5%
15.2%

Financial Services

22.7%
16.5%

Technology

14.0%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
13.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
11.0%

Basic Materials

6.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.6%

Energy

2.2%
5.4%

Utilities

1.8%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Industrials

FFSM
29.5%
SPSM
15.2%

Financial Services

FFSM
22.7%
SPSM
16.5%

Technology

FFSM
14.0%
SPSM
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FFSM
12.2%
SPSM
13.1%

Healthcare

FFSM
9.1%
SPSM
11.0%

Basic Materials

FFSM
6.2%
SPSM
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FFSM
2.3%
SPSM
3.6%

Energy

FFSM
2.2%
SPSM
5.4%

Utilities

FFSM
1.8%
SPSM
1.9%

Real Estate

FFSM
0.0%
SPSM
7.6%

Communication Services

FFSM

-

SPSM
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSM vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM
FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSM vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFSMSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.99

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.89

13.45

+2.44

FFSM vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSMSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-42.89%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-8.72%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-27.94%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.65%

-27.94%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.41%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-7.89%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.58%

-0.01%

Volatility

FFSM vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.93%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSMSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

4.93%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

12.04%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

17.65%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

21.42%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

22.99%

-2.37%

FFSM vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSM vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than SPSM's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.43%0.56%0.62%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.41%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFSM and SPSM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSM has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to SPSM (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 5-year performance, FFSM leads with 11.05% vs 6.36% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

FFSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.03% for SPSM.

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSM and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer