FFLG vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFLG charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

FFLG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: 16.49%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 28.99%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	16.49%	0.52%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and MEME is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.63

FFLG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLG	MEME
Technology	51.7%	58.8%
Communication Services	15.1%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	-
Healthcare	6.4%	5.4%
Industrials	5.9%	29.9%
Financial Services	3.3%	5.7%
Utilities	1.4%	10.7%
Basic Materials	1.4%	4.6%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	-
Energy	0.3%	4.8%

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.28	+0.15

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-48.78%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-5.93%	+5.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-29.90%	+15.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	74.19%	-55.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.34%	74.19%	-48.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	74.19%	-48.81%

FFLG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLG has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and MEME in my portfolio?

FFLG and MEME have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFLG or MEME?

On fees, FFLG is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLG or MEME?

FFLG is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLG or MEME?

FFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between FFLG and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLG and 0.69% for MEME.