FEMS vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEMS (First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEMS returned 9.49%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FEMS vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMS achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMS has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 9.49%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.

FEMS

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMS vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund	12.16%	16.48%	1.88%	3.55%	1.85%	3.76%	7.85%	28.88%	-22.63%	49.02%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMS and CIBR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.43

The correlation between FEMS and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEMS vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEMS	CIBR
Industrials	16.0%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	-
Technology	13.1%	94.0%
Basic Materials	12.0%	-
Energy	8.7%	-
Real Estate	7.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Utilities	6.6%	-
Financial Services	5.5%	-
Communication Services	4.6%	2.6%
Healthcare	3.4%	-

Return for Risk

FEMS vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMS

FEMS Risk / Return Rank: 47
FEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMS vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEMS	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.06	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.56	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	1.18	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	2.79	+4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEMS vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMS and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEMS	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.06	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.66	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.79	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.67	-0.39

Drawdowns

FEMS vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMS drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMS and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMS	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.85%	-33.89%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-21.99%	+13.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.09%	-21.99%	+0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.89%	-33.89%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.85%	-33.89%	-13.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.88%	-2.81%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.41%	-8.66%	-8.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	9.25%	-5.98%

Volatility

FEMS vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) is 6.37%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMS	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	10.90%	-4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	20.90%	-7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	24.50%	-8.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	24.95%	-7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	23.60%	-3.63%

FEMS vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMS vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund	4.28%	4.27%	3.97%	4.65%	4.55%	6.25%	2.90%	4.37%	4.68%	3.39%	2.42%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMS and CIBR in my portfolio?

FEMS and CIBR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMS or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FEMS (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMS dropped -47.85% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FEMS or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 9.49% for FEMS. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FEMS has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEMS or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEMS or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEMS or CIBR?

FEMS has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FEMS and CIBR?

FEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FEMS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEMS and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.