FEMS vs. EDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV).
FEMS and EDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEMS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Small Cap Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2012. EDIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. Both FEMS and EDIV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEMS or EDIV.
Performance
FEMS vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMS achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMS has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 5.30%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.
FEMS
3.85%
-1.24%
-3.52%
6.99%
6.26%
5.30%
EDIV
13.28%
-3.65%
2.82%
19.30%
7.30%
3.94%
Key characteristics
| FEMS | EDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.41 | 1.50 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.66 | 2.18 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.43 | 2.21 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.59 | 6.86 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.15% | 2.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.13% | 12.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.85% | -53.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.73% | -7.10% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMS vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FEMS and EDIV is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEMS vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEMS vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
FEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than EDIV's 3.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMS First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 3.65% | 4.65% | 4.55% | 6.25% | 2.90% | 4.38% | 4.68% | 3.39% | 2.42% | 3.28% | 3.49% | 1.79% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 3.58% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.93% | 5.33% | 4.84% | 5.13% |
Drawdowns
FEMS vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMS drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMS and EDIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEMS vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 3.79%. This indicates that FEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.