PortfoliosLab logo
FEMS vs. FNDF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FEMS and FNDF is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

FEMS vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
67.81%
102.80%
FEMS
FNDF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FEMS:

-0.01

FNDF:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

FEMS:

0.12

FNDF:

0.92

Omega Ratio

FEMS:

1.02

FNDF:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

FEMS:

-0.01

FNDF:

0.72

Martin Ratio

FEMS:

-0.03

FNDF:

2.11

Ulcer Index

FEMS:

7.36%

FNDF:

4.71%

Daily Std Dev

FEMS:

19.06%

FNDF:

17.20%

Max Drawdown

FEMS:

-47.85%

FNDF:

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

FEMS:

-11.19%

FNDF:

-1.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMS achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 11.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMS has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 4.18%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.86% annualized return.


FEMS

YTD

-1.89%

1M

-2.06%

6M

-3.77%

1Y

-1.05%

5Y*

11.56%

10Y*

4.18%

FNDF

YTD

11.41%

1M

0.35%

6M

6.59%

1Y

10.59%

5Y*

15.35%

10Y*

5.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEMS vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FEMS: current value is 0.80%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FEMS: 0.80%
Expense ratio chart for FNDF: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FNDF: 0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FEMS vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMS is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMS is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMS is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMS is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMS is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMS is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNDF is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNDF is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNDF is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNDF is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNDF is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNDF is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FEMS vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FEMS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FEMS: -0.01
FNDF: 0.58
The chart of Sortino ratio for FEMS, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FEMS: 0.12
FNDF: 0.92
The chart of Omega ratio for FEMS, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FEMS: 1.02
FNDF: 1.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for FEMS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FEMS: -0.01
FNDF: 0.72
The chart of Martin ratio for FEMS, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FEMS: -0.03
FNDF: 2.11

The current FEMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMS and FNDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.01
0.58
FEMS
FNDF

Dividends

FEMS vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

FEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than FNDF's 3.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FEMS
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
3.85%3.97%4.65%4.55%6.25%2.90%4.37%4.68%3.39%2.42%3.28%3.48%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
3.60%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%1.84%

Drawdowns

FEMS vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMS drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMS and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.19%
-1.20%
FEMS
FNDF

Volatility

FEMS vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FEMS) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 10.90% and 11.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.90%
11.43%
FEMS
FNDF