FELE vs. ZWS
FELE (Franklin Electric Co., Inc.) and ZWS (Zurn Water Solutions Corporation) are both stocks. FELE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ZWS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, FELE returned 12.39%/yr vs 26.47%/yr for ZWS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FELE vs. ZWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELE achieves a 3.77% return, which is significantly higher than ZWS's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FELE has underperformed ZWS with an annualized return of 12.39%, while ZWS has yielded a comparatively higher 26.47% annualized return.
FELE
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
ZWS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 31.33%
- 3Y*
- 26.20%
- 5Y*
- 33.54%
- 10Y*
- 26.47%
FELE vs. ZWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELE Franklin Electric Co., Inc. | 3.77% | -0.86% | 1.82% | 22.38% | -14.85% | 37.80% | 22.08% | 35.26% | -5.61% | 19.21% |
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 2.49% | 25.81% | 28.08% | 40.63% | -41.48% | 299.70% | 22.26% | 42.14% | -11.80% | 32.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELE and ZWS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FELE and ZWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FELE:
$4.40
ZWS:
$1.25
FELE:
22.41
ZWS:
37.82
FELE:
35.73
ZWS:
2.32
FELE:
1.55
ZWS:
4.64
FELE:
$2.18B
ZWS:
$1.74B
FELE:
$766.99M
ZWS:
$760.20M
FELE:
$258.17M
ZWS:
$369.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELE vs. ZWS — Risk / Return Rank
FELE
ZWS
FELE vs. ZWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELE | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.85 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 5.61 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELE | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.07 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.54 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.39 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FELE vs. ZWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELE drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than ZWS's maximum drawdown of -52.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELE and ZWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELE | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -52.43% | -18.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.18% | -17.02% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.52% | -30.18% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -47.25% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.02% | -47.25% | +15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.01% | -9.96% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -16.14% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 5.60% | +1.50% |
Volatility
FELE vs. ZWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) is 6.75%, while Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that FELE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELE | ZWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 8.43% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.35% | 21.55% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.31% | 29.36% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 62.37% | -35.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.25% | 51.66% | -20.41% |
Dividends
FELE vs. ZWS - Dividend Comparison
FELE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than ZWS's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELE Franklin Electric Co., Inc. | 1.11% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 1.42% |
ZWS Zurn Water Solutions Corporation | 0.89% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 92.93% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FELE vs. ZWS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FELE vs. ZWS - Profitability Comparison
FELE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 174.97M and revenue of 500.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.
ZWS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a gross profit of 205.80M and revenue of 433.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
FELE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 48.09M and revenue of 500.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
ZWS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
FELE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported a net income of 34.33M and revenue of 500.44M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
ZWS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zurn Water Solutions Corporation reported a net income of 58.90M and revenue of 433.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FELE and ZWS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZWS has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to FELE (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELE dropped -71.12% vs ZWS's -52.43%.
ZWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELE and ZWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer