FELE vs. LW
FELE (Franklin Electric Co., Inc.) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. FELE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FELE returned 6.56%/yr vs -9.24%/yr for LW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FELE vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FELE having a 9.07% return and LW slightly lower at 8.99%.
FELE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 20.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
LW
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- -14.53%
- 3Y*
- -25.20%
- 5Y*
- -9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FELE vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELE Franklin Electric Co., Inc. | 9.07% | -0.86% | 1.82% | 22.38% | -14.85% | 37.80% | 22.08% | 35.26% | -5.61% | 19.21% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 8.99% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELE and LW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
FELE:
$4.40
LW:
$2.15
FELE:
23.55
LW:
20.86
FELE:
37.56
LW:
0.29
FELE:
1.63
LW:
0.96
FELE:
$2.18B
LW:
$6.52B
FELE:
$766.99M
LW:
$1.34B
FELE:
$258.17M
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELE vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
FELE
LW
FELE vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FELE | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.35 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | -0.60 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FELE vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELE drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELE and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELE | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -64.56% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.18% | -41.37% | +23.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.52% | -64.56% | +41.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -64.56% | +35.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -58.30% | +52.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -21.41% | +7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | 24.39% | -17.12% |
Volatility
FELE vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) is 7.12%, while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that FELE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELE | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 8.88% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.45% | 38.62% | -15.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.53% | 44.41% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 37.90% | -10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.18% | 35.87% | -4.69% |
Dividends
FELE vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
FELE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than LW's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELE Franklin Electric Co., Inc. | 1.05% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 0.92% | 1.02% | 1.42% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.34% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FELE vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FELE vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
FELE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 174.97M and revenue of 500.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
FELE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 48.09M and revenue of 500.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
FELE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Electric Co., Inc. reported a net income of 34.33M and revenue of 500.44M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FELE and LW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LW has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to FELE (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELE dropped -71.12% vs LW's -64.56%.
FELE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELE and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer