PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FELE vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FELEETN
YTD Return12.64%54.14%
1Y Return26.06%69.98%
3Y Return (Ann)5.71%30.57%
5Y Return (Ann)15.78%34.62%
10Y Return (Ann)12.30%21.72%
Sharpe Ratio1.062.58
Sortino Ratio1.563.11
Omega Ratio1.211.45
Calmar Ratio1.413.57
Martin Ratio4.9711.52
Ulcer Index5.26%6.13%
Daily Std Dev24.62%27.41%
Max Drawdown-71.12%-68.95%
Current Drawdown-1.80%0.00%

Fundamentals


FELEETN
Market Cap$4.95B$144.91B
EPS$3.93$9.57
PE Ratio27.4338.31
PEG Ratio2.053.12
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.01B$24.61B
Gross Profit (TTM)$713.05M$9.52B
EBITDA (TTM)$250.03M$4.99B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between FELE and ETN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FELE vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FELE achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 54.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FELE has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 12.30%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.26%
12.31%
FELE
ETN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FELE vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FELE, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FELE, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FELE, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FELE, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FELE, currently valued at 4.97, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.97
ETN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ETN, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ETN, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ETN, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ETN, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ETN, currently valued at 11.52, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.52

FELE vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELE Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELE and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.06
2.58
FELE
ETN

Dividends

FELE vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

FELE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ETN's 1.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
0.93%0.93%0.98%0.74%0.90%1.01%1.09%0.92%1.02%1.42%0.93%0.68%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.03%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%2.21%

Drawdowns

FELE vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELE drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELE and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.80%
0
FELE
ETN

Volatility

FELE vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 8.59%. This indicates that FELE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.09%
8.59%
FELE
ETN

Financials

FELE vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items