FELE vs. EMR

In the year-to-date period, FELE achieves a -8.26% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's -14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FELE has outperformed EMR with an annualized return of 10.63%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FELE Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the EMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELE and EMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FELE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than EMR's 2.00% yield.

The maximum FELE drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than EMR's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELE and EMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Franklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE) is 12.32%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that FELE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Electric Co., Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.