PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. TILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. TILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than TILT's 10.68% return.


FEDM

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.29%
YTD
6.03%
6M
8.22%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
10Y*

TILT

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDM vs. TILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
6.03%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.87%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
10.68%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and TILT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.77

The correlation between FEDM and TILT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. TILT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDM
TILT

Financial Services

27.1%
16.0%

Industrials

17.8%
10.1%

Technology

10.9%
27.2%

Healthcare

10.0%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
2.7%

Energy

5.7%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.9%

Communication Services

4.6%
8.6%

Utilities

3.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.1%

Financial Services

FEDM
27.1%
TILT
16.0%

Industrials

FEDM
17.8%
TILT
10.1%

Technology

FEDM
10.9%
TILT
27.2%

Healthcare

FEDM
10.0%
TILT
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

FEDM
7.1%
TILT
4.7%

Basic Materials

FEDM
5.9%
TILT
2.7%

Energy

FEDM
5.7%
TILT
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDM
5.7%
TILT
10.9%

Communication Services

FEDM
4.6%
TILT
8.6%

Utilities

FEDM
3.5%
TILT
2.4%

Real Estate

FEDM
1.8%
TILT
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. TILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDM vs. TILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEDMTILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.36

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

14.71

-9.74

FEDM vs. TILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the TILT Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and TILT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEDMTILTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.33

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.83

-0.38

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. TILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum TILT drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and TILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMTILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-38.46%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-8.51%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-19.85%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.67%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-4.23%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.94%

+1.36%

Volatility

FEDM vs. TILT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) at 3.04%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMTILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

3.04%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

8.95%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

12.29%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

17.39%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

18.75%

-2.29%

FEDM vs. TILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TILT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDM vs. TILT - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than TILT's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.82%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.07%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and TILT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to TILT (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs TILT's -38.46%.

On 3-year performance, TILT leads with 20.80% vs 13.99% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TILT has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TILT.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.07% for TILT.

FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TILT is Large Cap Blend Equities. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.25% for TILT.

TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and TILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer