PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. TILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. TILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than TILT's 13.40% return.


FEDM

1D
0.22%
1M
3.09%
6M
6.36%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.18%

TILT

1D
1.30%
1M
1.88%
6M
10.37%
YTD
13.40%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
13.72%
ALL TIME*
14.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.63K$72.04K$75.32K
$671.45K$1.20M$1.62M

FEDM vs. TILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
11.29%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.50%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
13.40%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and TILT is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

0.77

The correlation between FEDM and TILT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. TILT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDM
TILT

Financial Services

28.7%
16.3%

Industrials

16.9%
9.9%

Technology

11.1%
29.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
2.1%

Energy

5.6%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.5%

Communication Services

3.3%
8.0%

Utilities

3.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.9%

Financial Services

FEDM
28.7%
TILT
16.3%

Industrials

FEDM
16.9%
TILT
9.9%

Technology

FEDM
11.1%
TILT
29.8%

Healthcare

FEDM
9.1%
TILT
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

FEDM
6.5%
TILT
4.6%

Basic Materials

FEDM
6.4%
TILT
2.1%

Energy

FEDM
5.6%
TILT
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDM
5.4%
TILT
10.5%

Communication Services

FEDM
3.3%
TILT
8.0%

Utilities

FEDM
3.2%
TILT
2.3%

Real Estate

FEDM
1.7%
TILT
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. TILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDM vs. TILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDMTILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.11

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

13.40

-6.16

FEDM vs. TILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the TILT Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and TILT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. TILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum TILT drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and TILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMTILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-38.46%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-8.51%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-19.85%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

0.00%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-4.19%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.97%

+1.29%

Volatility

FEDM vs. TILT - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) at 3.33%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMTILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.33%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

9.61%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

12.72%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.41%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

18.70%

-2.29%

FEDM vs. TILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TILT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDM vs. TILT - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than TILT's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.87%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.06%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and TILT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to TILT (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs TILT's -38.46%.

On 3-year performance, TILT leads with 19.26% vs 15.57% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TILT has performed better with a 19.26% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TILT.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.06% for TILT.

FEDM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TILT is Large Cap Blend Equities. FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.25% for TILT.

TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and TILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer