PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.


FEDM

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
6.49%
6M
5.86%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEDM vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and IFLO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.78

FEDM vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDM
IFLO

Financial Services

27.0%
1.1%

Industrials

17.3%
18.1%

Technology

11.9%
21.5%

Healthcare

9.8%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
2.8%

Basic Materials

6.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
13.8%

Energy

5.4%
12.1%

Communication Services

5.0%
6.7%

Utilities

3.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.0%

Financial Services

FEDM
27.0%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

FEDM
17.3%
IFLO
18.1%

Technology

FEDM
11.9%
IFLO
21.5%

Healthcare

FEDM
9.8%
IFLO
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEDM
6.9%
IFLO
2.8%

Basic Materials

FEDM
6.0%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDM
5.8%
IFLO
13.8%

Energy

FEDM
5.4%
IFLO
12.1%

Communication Services

FEDM
5.0%
IFLO
6.7%

Utilities

FEDM
3.3%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

FEDM
1.7%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEDM vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDMIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

FEDM vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-6.44%

-22.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-6.44%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-3.37%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-1.25%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

Volatility

FEDM vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

14.75%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

14.75%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

14.75%

+1.72%

FEDM vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDM vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
3.00%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and IFLO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 17.48% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer