FEDM vs. IFLO
FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, FEDM returned 17.48% vs 32.28% for IFLO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
FEDM vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEDM vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 6.49% | 10.32% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and IFLO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.78 |
FEDM vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEDM
IFLO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEDM
IFLO
Industrials
FEDM
IFLO
Technology
FEDM
IFLO
Healthcare
FEDM
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
FEDM
IFLO
Basic Materials
FEDM
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
FEDM
IFLO
Energy
FEDM
IFLO
Communication Services
FEDM
IFLO
Utilities
FEDM
IFLO
Real Estate
FEDM
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDM vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
FEDM
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FEDM vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEDM | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDM | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -6.44% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -6.44% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -3.37% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -1.25% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility
FEDM vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDM | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 14.75% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 14.75% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 14.75% | +1.72% |
FEDM vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEDM vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 3.00% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDM and IFLO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 17.48% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for FEDM and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer