IFLO vs. CFA
IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) and CFA (VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFLO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by VictoryShares, while CFA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFLO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CFA.
Performance
IFLO vs. CFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLO achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than CFA's 6.98% return.
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 22.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFA
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
IFLO vs. CFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 20.11% | 12.93% |
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 6.98% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLO and CFA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.65 |
IFLO vs. CFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFLO
CFA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
IFLO
CFA
Technology
IFLO
CFA
Consumer Cyclical
IFLO
CFA
Energy
IFLO
CFA
Healthcare
IFLO
CFA
Basic Materials
IFLO
CFA
Communication Services
IFLO
CFA
Consumer Defensive
IFLO
CFA
Utilities
IFLO
CFA
Financial Services
IFLO
CFA
Real Estate
IFLO
CFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLO vs. CFA — Risk / Return Rank
IFLO
CFA
IFLO vs. CFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) and VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFLO | CFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.75 | 0.62 | +2.13 |
Drawdowns
IFLO vs. CFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLO drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum CFA drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLO and CFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLO | CFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -37.74% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -4.17% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
IFLO vs. CFA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLO | CFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 10.69% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 15.06% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 17.22% | -3.05% |
IFLO vs. CFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than CFA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLO vs. CFA - Dividend Comparison
IFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than CFA's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 1.31% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.02% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLO and CFA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
CFA has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.02% for IFLO.
IFLO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CFA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IFLO and 0.35% for CFA.
Find the right allocation for IFLO and CFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer