PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDM vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 11.71% return.


FEDM

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.87%
6M
6.92%
YTD
11.05%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.15%

BKIE

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.29%
6M
6.90%
YTD
11.71%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.08M$6.86M$6.10M
$27.64K$60.01K$69.14K

FEDM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
11.05%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.50%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
11.71%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and BKIE is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

0.96

The correlation between FEDM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEDM
BKIE

Financial Services

28.7%
26.6%

Industrials

16.9%
17.9%

Technology

11.1%
11.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
6.3%

Basic Materials

6.4%
6.7%

Energy

5.6%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.2%

Communication Services

3.3%
4.1%

Utilities

3.2%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

FEDM
28.7%
BKIE
26.6%

Industrials

FEDM
16.9%
BKIE
17.9%

Technology

FEDM
11.1%
BKIE
11.7%

Healthcare

FEDM
9.1%
BKIE
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

FEDM
6.5%
BKIE
6.3%

Basic Materials

FEDM
6.4%
BKIE
6.7%

Energy

FEDM
5.6%
BKIE
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FEDM
5.4%
BKIE
7.2%

Communication Services

FEDM
3.3%
BKIE
4.1%

Utilities

FEDM
3.2%
BKIE
3.5%

Real Estate

FEDM
1.7%
BKIE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDMBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.25

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

8.73

-1.73

FEDM vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDMBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-28.19%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-11.41%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-13.19%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.70%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-4.88%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.93%

+0.33%

Volatility

FEDM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDMBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.29%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

13.05%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

15.27%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

16.21%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

16.32%

+0.10%

FEDM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FEDM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than BKIE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.15%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.87%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDM and BKIE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKIE has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to FEDM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 3-year performance, BKIE leads with 17.23% vs 14.74% for FEDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.87% for FEDM.

FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDM and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer