FEDM vs. BKIE
FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FEDM tracks the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 14.34%/yr vs 17.74%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
FEDM vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 9.43% return.
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FEDM vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 7.01% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 17.39% | -15.25% | 1.87% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.43% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and BKIE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FEDM and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEDM vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEDM
BKIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEDM
BKIE
Industrials
FEDM
BKIE
Technology
FEDM
BKIE
Healthcare
FEDM
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
FEDM
BKIE
Basic Materials
FEDM
BKIE
Energy
FEDM
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
FEDM
BKIE
Communication Services
FEDM
BKIE
Utilities
FEDM
BKIE
Real Estate
FEDM
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDM vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
FEDM
BKIE
FEDM vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDM | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.59 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.26 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.12 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 8.19 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDM | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.59 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.93 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, roughly equal to the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDM | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -28.19% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -11.41% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -13.19% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.45% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -4.98% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 2.95% | +0.35% |
Volatility
FEDM vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.53%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDM | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.53% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 12.14% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 14.57% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.12% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.34% | +0.12% |
FEDM vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEDM vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than BKIE's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDM and BKIE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEDM has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to BKIE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 3-year performance, BKIE leads with 17.74% vs 14.34% for FEDM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 14.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.80% for FEDM.
FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.04% for BKIE.
BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEDM and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer