PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEU vs. EUDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEU vs. EUDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSEU achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly higher than EUDG's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GSEU has outperformed EUDG with an annualized return of 10.17%, while EUDG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.


GSEU

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.18%
YTD
6.37%
6M
6.48%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
10.17%

EUDG

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.16%
6M
3.28%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEU vs. EUDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
6.37%35.70%2.00%20.74%-17.90%17.33%6.64%24.57%-14.29%26.97%
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
3.16%28.94%-4.30%19.36%-18.24%16.87%11.29%28.52%-15.19%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GSEU and EUDG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.93

The correlation between GSEU and EUDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSEU vs. EUDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEU
EUDG

Financial Services

24.0%
15.0%

Industrials

20.0%
18.7%

Healthcare

13.3%
17.6%

Technology

9.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
12.2%

Basic Materials

5.1%
3.3%

Utilities

4.6%
1.6%

Energy

4.2%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.1%

Financial Services

GSEU
24.0%
EUDG
15.0%

Industrials

GSEU
20.0%
EUDG
18.7%

Healthcare

GSEU
13.3%
EUDG
17.6%

Technology

GSEU
9.1%
EUDG
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

GSEU
8.3%
EUDG
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEU
6.7%
EUDG
12.2%

Basic Materials

GSEU
5.1%
EUDG
3.3%

Utilities

GSEU
4.6%
EUDG
1.6%

Energy

GSEU
4.2%
EUDG
3.9%

Communication Services

GSEU
4.0%
EUDG
4.2%

Real Estate

GSEU
0.5%
EUDG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEU vs. EUDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EUDG
EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEU vs. EUDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSEUEUDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.19

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

3.82

+2.20

GSEU vs. EUDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the EUDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSEU and EUDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSEU vs. EUDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEU drawdown since its inception was -35.71%, which is greater than EUDG's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEU and EUDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEUEUDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.71%

-33.76%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-12.20%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-13.73%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

-33.30%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

-33.76%

-1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-3.85%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-7.71%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.79%

-0.63%

Volatility

GSEU vs. EUDG - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) and WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEUEUDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.54%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

12.79%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

15.42%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

16.74%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

17.39%

+0.38%

GSEU vs. EUDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEU vs. EUDG - Dividend Comparison

GSEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than EUDG's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.22%2.19%2.41%2.14%3.07%2.98%1.87%2.30%3.00%1.55%2.49%2.10%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.56%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GSEU and EUDG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EUDG has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to GSEU (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEU dropped -35.71% vs EUDG's -33.76%.

On 10-year performance, GSEU leads with 10.17% vs 8.98% for EUDG. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

GSEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.22% for EUDG.

GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index, while EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSEU and 0.58% for EUDG.

GSEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEU and EUDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer