FEDM vs. FID

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FEDM tracks the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 15.57%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for FID. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.

Performance

FEDM vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEDM having a 11.29% return and FID slightly higher at 11.85%.

FEDM

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 6.36%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 1Y: 23.54%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.18%

FID

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.60%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	$59.63K	$72.04K	$75.32K
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	$249.39K	$252.43K	$349.18K

FEDM vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	11.29%	26.85%	2.85%	17.39%	-15.25%	1.50%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	11.85%	32.07%	5.42%	9.92%	-9.69%	3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDM and FID is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021	0.79

The correlation between FEDM and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEDM vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEDM	FID
Financial Services	28.7%	20.5%
Industrials	16.9%	12.8%
Technology	11.1%	6.2%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	3.7%
Basic Materials	6.4%	4.6%
Energy	5.6%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	4.0%
Communication Services	3.3%	10.7%
Utilities	3.2%	16.9%
Real Estate	1.7%	9.4%

Return for Risk

FEDM vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDM

FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 56
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FID

FID Risk / Return Rank: 80
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDM vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEDM	FID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.20	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	3.08	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.39	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.50	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	8.44	-1.20

FEDM vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDM and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEDM vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and FID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEDM	FID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.37%	-39.79%	+10.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-8.93%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	-9.61%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.86%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.79%	-8.33%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	2.64%	+0.62%

Volatility

FEDM vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 2.46%. This indicates that FEDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEDM	FID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	2.46%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	8.49%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.56%	10.16%	+6.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.41%	17.02%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.41%	18.82%	-2.41%

FEDM vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEDM vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than FID's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund	2.87%	2.97%	2.94%	2.61%	2.53%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.05%	4.30%	4.31%	4.19%	4.22%	3.76%	3.91%	3.70%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEDM and FID in my portfolio?

FEDM and FID have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEDM or FID?

FEDM has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FID (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs FID's -39.79%.

Which ETF is better, FEDM or FID?

On 3-year performance, FID leads with 18.43% vs 15.57% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEDM or FID?

Over the 3-year period, FID has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEDM or FID?

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEDM or FID?

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 2.87% for FEDM.

What is the main difference between FEDM and FID?

FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.60% for FID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.