PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVUS vs. DMXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVUS vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EVUS having a 13.26% return and DMXF slightly lower at 13.19%.


EVUS

1D
0.00%
1M
1.24%
6M
8.62%
YTD
13.26%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.74%

DMXF

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.14%
6M
9.04%
YTD
13.19%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.27M$15.45M$8.92M
$812.63K$2.09M$1.35M

EVUS vs. DMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
13.26%13.31%14.23%3.68%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
13.19%22.07%3.99%8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EVUS and DMXF is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.67

The correlation between EVUS and DMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVUS vs. DMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVUS
EVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVUS vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVUSDMXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.91

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

7.17

+4.58

EVUS vs. DMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVUS and DMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVUS vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.65%, smaller than the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVUS and DMXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVUSDMXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.65%

-34.52%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-11.84%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-16.54%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.47%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-7.51%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.14%

-1.32%

Volatility

EVUS vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) is 2.85%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that EVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVUSDMXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

5.40%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

14.99%

-6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

17.34%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.62%

17.89%

-5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

17.34%

-4.72%

EVUS vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVUS vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

EVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than DMXF's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.21%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
1.48%1.62%1.99%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVUS and DMXF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMXF has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to EVUS (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVUS dropped -15.65% vs DMXF's -34.52%.

On 3-year performance, DMXF leads with 14.62% vs 14.60% for EVUS. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, EVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMXF has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EVUS.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.48% for EVUS.

EVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DMXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EVUS tracks MSCI USA Value Extended ESG Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EVUS and 0.12% for DMXF.

EVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVUS and DMXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer