PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTS has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 10.50%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.


FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%

CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and CIBR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.38

The correlation between FDTS and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDTS vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
CIBR

Industrials

23.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%

-

Technology

13.4%
94.0%

Financial Services

11.7%

-

Basic Materials

11.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Real Estate

4.3%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Communication Services

3.0%
2.6%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Industrials

FDTS
23.0%
CIBR
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.4%
CIBR

-

Technology

FDTS
13.4%
CIBR
94.0%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.7%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.2%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
5.0%
CIBR

-

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
CIBR

-

Energy

FDTS
4.3%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

FDTS
3.0%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

FDTS
3.0%
CIBR
2.6%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTSCIBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.20

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.18

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

2.79

+10.53

FDTS vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTSCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.06

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.66

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.79

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.67

-0.30

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-33.89%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-21.99%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-21.99%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-33.89%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-33.89%

-17.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-2.81%

-3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-8.66%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

9.25%

-5.81%

Volatility

FDTS vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) is 6.54%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FDTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

10.90%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

20.90%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

24.50%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

24.95%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

23.60%

+1.25%

FDTS vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and CIBR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FDTS (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 10.50% for FDTS. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FDTS has been the lower-risk option at 6.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.60% for CIBR.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer