FDTS vs. SCHD
FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDTS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDTS returned 10.50%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDTS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FDTS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.
FDTS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 19.06%
- 1Y
- 45.71%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.50%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
FDTS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 16.64% | 51.17% | 2.44% | 10.96% | -15.34% | 11.79% | 12.90% | 18.71% | -23.71% | 36.01% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTS and SCHD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012 | 0.37 |
FDTS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDTS
SCHD
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
FDTS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FDTS
SCHD
Technology
FDTS
SCHD
Financial Services
FDTS
SCHD
Basic Materials
FDTS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FDTS
SCHD
Real Estate
FDTS
SCHD
-
Energy
FDTS
SCHD
Healthcare
FDTS
SCHD
Communication Services
FDTS
SCHD
Utilities
FDTS
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDTS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FDTS
SCHD
FDTS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 5.91 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.32 | 14.53 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.49 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.58 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.86 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
FDTS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -33.37% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -4.61% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | -16.13% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.11% | -16.85% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | -33.37% | -17.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -1.40% | -5.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -3.32% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.88% | +1.56% |
Volatility
FDTS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDTS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 2.66% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 7.66% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 10.96% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 14.38% | +14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 16.72% | +8.13% |
FDTS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDTS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.58% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDTS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 10.50% for FDTS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.58% for FDTS.
FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.06% for SCHD.
FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDTS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer