PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDTS having a 16.64% return and AVDV slightly lower at 16.04%.


FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%

AVDV

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.04%
6M
19.54%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%11.17%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.04%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and AVDV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FDTS and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDTS vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
AVDV

Industrials

23.0%
21.3%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
14.4%

Technology

13.4%
6.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
13.7%

Basic Materials

11.2%
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.4%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.1%

Energy

4.3%
10.8%

Healthcare

3.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.0%

Utilities

2.7%
1.7%

Industrials

FDTS
23.0%
AVDV
21.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.4%
AVDV
14.4%

Technology

FDTS
13.4%
AVDV
6.4%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.7%
AVDV
13.7%

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.2%
AVDV
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
5.0%
AVDV
3.4%

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
AVDV
1.1%

Energy

FDTS
4.3%
AVDV
10.8%

Healthcare

FDTS
3.0%
AVDV
2.1%

Communication Services

FDTS
3.0%
AVDV
2.0%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTSAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.37

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

13.67

-0.35

FDTS vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTSAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.80

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.80

-0.43

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-43.01%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-13.19%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-14.17%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-28.08%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-1.35%

-5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-6.77%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.24%

+0.20%

Volatility

FDTS vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.92%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.92%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

13.07%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

15.56%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

17.30%

+11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

19.73%

+5.12%

FDTS vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and AVDV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 10.59% for FDTS. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.58% for FDTS.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer