FDT vs. HERO
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDT returned 12.16%/yr vs -4.76%/yr for HERO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
FDT vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -17.16% return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
HERO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 6M
- -17.60%
- 1Y
- -19.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- -4.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FDT vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 4.41% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -17.16% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and HERO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FDT and HERO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDT vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
HERO
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FDT
HERO
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
HERO
-
Financial Services
FDT
HERO
-
Basic Materials
FDT
HERO
-
Energy
FDT
HERO
-
Technology
FDT
HERO
Real Estate
FDT
HERO
-
Utilities
FDT
HERO
-
Consumer Defensive
FDT
HERO
-
Communication Services
FDT
HERO
Healthcare
FDT
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
HERO
FDT vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.84 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.70 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | -1.33 | +15.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -54.02% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -28.08% | +14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -28.08% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -48.06% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -30.29% | +26.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -25.97% | +15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 14.82% | -11.28% |
Volatility
FDT vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) at 4.45%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 4.45% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 15.21% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 19.53% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 23.36% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 24.46% | -5.84% |
FDT vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than HERO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.96% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and HERO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to HERO (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.16% vs -4.76% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.16% return vs -4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.96% for HERO.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.50% for HERO.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer