FDT vs. FLKR
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDT returned 12.16%/yr vs 17.78%/yr for FLKR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FDT vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 98.10% return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 113.45%
- 1Y
- 191.57%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- —
FDT vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 2.76% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 98.10% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and FLKR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FDT and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDT vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
FLKR
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
FDT
FLKR
Technology
FDT
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
FLKR
Financial Services
FDT
FLKR
Basic Materials
FDT
FLKR
Energy
FDT
FLKR
Real Estate
FDT
FLKR
-
Utilities
FDT
FLKR
Communication Services
FDT
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
FDT
FLKR
Healthcare
FDT
FLKR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
FLKR
FDT vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.58 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 8.11 | -4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 28.21 | -14.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -50.06% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -23.03% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -26.39% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -49.51% | +16.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -9.25% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -22.03% | +11.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 6.61% | -3.07% |
Volatility
FDT vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) is 8.93%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that FDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 25.85% | -16.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 42.11% | -24.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 45.82% | -26.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 29.58% | -11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 28.37% | -9.75% |
FDT vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than FLKR's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.95% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and FLKR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to FDT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.78% vs 12.16% for FDT. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.78% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer