PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. XTN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. XTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than XTN's 21.69% return.


FDRV

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.30%
6M
8.32%
YTD
9.64%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
-2.81%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-6.71%

XTN

1D
1.67%
1M
-4.39%
6M
10.95%
YTD
21.69%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.26%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
10.02%
ALL TIME*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.45K$140.01K$198.80K
$3.13M$3.62M$6.07M

FDRV vs. XTN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
9.64%24.32%-21.73%12.27%-44.23%7.10%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
21.69%6.33%4.86%25.22%-28.10%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and XTN is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.71

The correlation between FDRV and XTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDRV vs. XTN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRV
XTN

Consumer Cyclical

48.6%

-

Technology

37.2%
5.3%

Industrials

10.9%
94.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDRV
48.6%
XTN

-

Technology

FDRV
37.2%
XTN
5.3%

Industrials

FDRV
10.9%
XTN
94.7%

Basic Materials

FDRV
3.2%
XTN

-

Communication Services

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Consumer Defensive

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Energy

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Financial Services

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Healthcare

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Real Estate

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Utilities

FDRV

-

XTN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. XTN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XTN
XTN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDRV vs. XTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDRVXTNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.25

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

6.27

-3.28

FDRV vs. XTN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the XTN Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and XTN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. XTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than XTN's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and XTN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVXTNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-43.77%

-20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-17.28%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.42%

-33.69%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.34%

-5.88%

-33.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-10.85%

-31.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

6.19%

+1.03%

Volatility

FDRV vs. XTN - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) at 5.89%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVXTNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

5.89%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.53%

22.33%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

27.66%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

26.87%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

26.17%

+5.99%

FDRV vs. XTN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XTN's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. XTN - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than XTN's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.30%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
0.66%0.78%0.93%0.73%1.04%1.02%0.75%1.17%0.98%0.63%0.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and XTN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDRV has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to XTN (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs XTN's -43.77%.

On 3-year performance, XTN leads with 10.26% vs -2.81% for FDRV. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTN has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTN has performed better with a 10.26% return vs -2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.66% for XTN.

FDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while XTN is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.35% for XTN.

XTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and XTN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer