FDRV vs. VIS
FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRV is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. FDRV is actively managed, while VIS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDRV returned 7.44%/yr vs 22.65%/yr for VIS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIS.
Performance
FDRV vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 32.06% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 14.99% return.
FDRV
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 32.06%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 57.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
FDRV vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 32.06% | 24.32% | -21.73% | 12.27% | -44.23% | 7.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 14.99% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRV and VIS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FDRV and VIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRV vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRV
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDRV
VIS
Technology
FDRV
VIS
Industrials
FDRV
VIS
Basic Materials
FDRV
VIS
Communication Services
FDRV
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
FDRV
-
VIS
-
Energy
FDRV
-
VIS
Financial Services
FDRV
-
VIS
Healthcare
FDRV
-
VIS
Real Estate
FDRV
-
VIS
Utilities
FDRV
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRV vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
FDRV
VIS
FDRV vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDRV | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 2.51 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.31 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 9.60 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRV | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.52 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
FDRV vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRV | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -63.51% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -12.29% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.45% | -20.80% | -27.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.94% | -0.91% | -26.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.36% | -8.38% | -33.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 2.95% | +2.08% |
Volatility
FDRV vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 5.29%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRV | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 5.29% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.48% | 13.55% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 16.42% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 18.35% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 20.43% | +11.61% |
FDRV vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRV vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than VIS's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 0.43% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRV and VIS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDRV has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to VIS (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 3-year performance, VIS leads with 22.65% vs 7.44% for FDRV. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VIS has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.
FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.
FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.10% for VIS.
FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRV and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer