PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 32.06% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 29.13% return.


FDRV

1D
3.68%
1M
12.17%
YTD
32.06%
6M
32.82%
1Y
57.85%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
2.13%
1M
3.32%
YTD
29.13%
6M
30.52%
1Y
53.09%
3Y*
26.34%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
19.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
32.06%24.32%-21.73%12.27%-44.23%7.00%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
29.13%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and GRID is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.79

The correlation between FDRV and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRV vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRV
GRID

Consumer Cyclical

42.8%
3.5%

Technology

40.7%
11.0%

Industrials

12.3%
65.2%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDRV
42.8%
GRID
3.5%

Technology

FDRV
40.7%
GRID
11.0%

Industrials

FDRV
12.3%
GRID
65.2%

Basic Materials

FDRV
4.3%
GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Energy

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

FDRV

-

GRID

-

Utilities

FDRV

-

GRID
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVGRIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.75

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

3.58

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.57

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.36

17.34

-5.98

FDRV vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.75

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.57

-0.67

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-40.56%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-11.73%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.45%

-20.77%

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.94%

-1.16%

-25.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.36%

-8.43%

-33.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

3.09%

+1.94%

Volatility

FDRV vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.99%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

7.99%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.48%

16.13%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

19.39%

+5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.04%

21.00%

+11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.04%

22.81%

+9.23%

FDRV vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than GRID's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.02%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.76%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and GRID have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDRV has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to GRID (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 3-year performance, GRID leads with 26.34% vs 7.44% for FDRV. On fees, FDRV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GRID has performed better with a 26.34% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDRV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.76% for GRID.

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer