FDLO vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FDLO and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDLO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both FDLO and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDLO or SCHG.
Performance
FDLO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 17.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 32.77% return.
FDLO
17.72%
-0.23%
11.29%
21.09%
12.00%
N/A
SCHG
32.77%
2.85%
15.79%
38.25%
20.42%
16.44%
Key characteristics
| FDLO | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.48 | 2.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.35 | 2.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.83 | 3.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.80 | 12.46 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.38% | 3.12% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.79% | 16.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.35% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.23% | -1.33% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDLO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FDLO and SCHG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDLO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDLO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.27% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
FDLO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDLO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 3.01%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.