FDLO vs. FMIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLO is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while FMIL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FDLO is passively managed, while FMIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 9.28%/yr vs 16.06%/yr for FMIL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FMIL.

Performance

FDLO vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's 9.17% return.

FDLO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: 9.28%
• 10Y*: —

FMIL

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 16.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. FMIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	2.45%	11.77%	16.06%	16.38%	-10.38%	24.00%	15.70%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	9.17%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FMIL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.77

The correlation between FDLO and FMIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLO vs. FMIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLO	FMIL
Technology	35.5%	32.5%
Financial Services	12.1%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.7%
Healthcare	9.6%	8.1%
Industrials	8.3%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.2%	4.4%
Utilities	2.2%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FMIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO

FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 39
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 57
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLO	FMIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.81	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.49	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	2.46	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	10.96	-4.00

FDLO vs. FMIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the FMIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FMIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FMIL's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FMIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLO	FMIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.35%	-19.72%	-14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-9.98%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.68%	-19.72%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-19.72%	+0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-2.37%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-2.98%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	2.24%	-0.54%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 2.52%, while Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLO	FMIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	5.32%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	10.71%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.87%	13.56%	-4.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.08%	17.00%	-3.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	17.69%	-2.21%

FDLO vs. FMIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIL's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLO vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than FMIL's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF	1.45%	1.37%	1.40%	1.35%	1.49%	1.11%	1.38%	1.55%	1.76%	1.61%	0.55%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.01%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLO and FMIL in my portfolio?

FDLO and FMIL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLO or FMIL?

FMIL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FDLO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs FMIL's -19.72%.

Which ETF is better, FDLO or FMIL?

On 5-year performance, FMIL leads with 16.06% vs 9.28% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLO or FMIL?

Over the 5-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 16.06% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLO or FMIL?

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLO or FMIL?

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.01% for FMIL.

What is the main difference between FDLO and FMIL?

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FMIL is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.59% for FMIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.