PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return.


FDLO

1D
0.52%
1M
2.54%
6M
6.36%
YTD
8.41%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.52M$3.68M$3.65M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

FDLO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
8.41%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and VOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.89

The correlation between FDLO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDLO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
VOO

Technology

33.2%
38.6%

Financial Services

13.1%
11.4%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.9%

Communication Services

10.1%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.5%

Industrials

8.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Energy

3.1%
3.0%

Utilities

2.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

FDLO
33.2%
VOO
38.6%

Financial Services

FDLO
13.1%
VOO
11.4%

Healthcare

FDLO
10.6%
VOO
8.9%

Communication Services

FDLO
10.1%
VOO
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.0%
VOO
9.5%

Industrials

FDLO
8.7%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.7%
VOO
4.5%

Energy

FDLO
3.1%
VOO
3.0%

Utilities

FDLO
2.4%
VOO
2.2%

Real Estate

FDLO
2.3%
VOO
1.8%

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.8%
VOO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDLO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.21

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

9.44

-0.55

FDLO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-33.99%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-8.90%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-18.69%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-24.52%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.38%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-3.67%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.08%

-0.34%

Volatility

FDLO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 3.07%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.54%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

10.10%

-3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

12.82%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

16.93%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

18.01%

-2.58%

FDLO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDLO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.37%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and VOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FDLO (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 9.60% for FDLO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FDLO.

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

FDLO is categorized as Low Volatility, while VOO is S&P 500. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDLO and 0.03% for VOO.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer