FDIV vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDIV (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIV is a Dividend fund actively managed by MarketDesk, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. FDIV is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIV returned -2.13%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DFND. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDIV charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

FDIV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed DFND with an annualized return of -2.13%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.

FDIV

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -0.84%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 7.68%
• 3Y*: -12.10%
• 5Y*: -8.67%
• 10Y*: -2.13%

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF	0.72%	2.95%	-37.35%	6.78%	-9.97%	10.20%	-2.84%	15.78%	-5.04%	6.19%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	19.53%	-1.83%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and DFND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016	0.23

The correlation between FDIV and DFND shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIV	DFND
Industrials	24.9%	17.1%
Financial Services	20.0%	18.2%
Healthcare	16.2%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	9.0%	4.2%
Technology	8.9%	24.8%
Utilities	4.2%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	4.3%
Energy	3.0%	1.7%
Communication Services	3.0%	0.8%
Real Estate	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FDIV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV

FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 19
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 21

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDIV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.02	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	0.11	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.02	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	0.07	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	0.13	+2.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDIV vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDIV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	0.02	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	0.21	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12	0.38	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.36	-0.43

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIV	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.90%	-22.65%	-25.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.01%	-3.44%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.64%	-12.56%	-33.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.90%	-22.65%	-25.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.90%	-22.65%	-25.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.05%	-3.69%	-34.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-5.70%	-5.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	3.70%	-0.69%

Volatility

FDIV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that FDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIV	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	0.00%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	6.16%	+2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	10.92%	+1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	22.46%	-1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	19.09%	-1.55%

FDIV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDIV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF	2.89%	2.95%	4.12%	4.63%	3.81%	3.79%	4.17%	3.93%	5.13%	3.81%	3.84%	4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIV and DFND in my portfolio?

FDIV and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIV or DFND?

FDIV has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, FDIV or DFND?

On 10-year performance, DFND leads with 7.16% vs -2.13% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIV or DFND?

Over the 10-year period, DFND has performed better with a 7.16% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIV or DFND?

FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIV or DFND?

FDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between FDIV and DFND?

FDIV is categorized as Dividend, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.