FDIS vs. XLYI
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and XLYI (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while XLYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. FDIS is passively managed, while XLYI is actively managed. Over the past year, FDIS returned 9.49% vs 8.70% for XLYI. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLYI.
Performance
FDIS vs. XLYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than XLYI's -0.31% return.
FDIS
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.48%
XLYI
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.73M | $7.77M | $9.21M | |
| $81.44K | $62.05K | $59.61K |
FDIS vs. XLYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.23% | 5.60% |
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.31% | 5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and XLYI is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FDIS and XLYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIS vs. XLYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
XLYI
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
XLYI
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
XLYI
-
Industrials
FDIS
XLYI
-
Technology
FDIS
XLYI
Communication Services
FDIS
XLYI
-
Healthcare
FDIS
XLYI
-
Real Estate
FDIS
XLYI
-
Financial Services
FDIS
XLYI
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
XLYI
-
Energy
FDIS
-
XLYI
-
Utilities
FDIS
-
XLYI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. XLYI — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
XLYI
FDIS vs. XLYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. XLYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than XLYI's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XLYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -12.32% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -12.32% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -3.86% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -3.29% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 4.33% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. XLYI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 6.42% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.66% | 12.97% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 16.34% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 16.32% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 16.32% | +6.07% |
FDIS vs. XLYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLYI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. XLYI - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XLYI's 14.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.79% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FDIS and XLYI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to XLYI (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XLYI's -12.32%.
On 1-year performance, FDIS leads with 9.49% vs 8.70% for XLYI. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLYI has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLYI.
XLYI has the higher dividend yield at 14.79%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.35% for XLYI.
XLYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and XLYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer