PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 13.98%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%

XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XLE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.37

The correlation between FDIS and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
XLE

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Technology

0.9%

-

Industrials

0.8%

-

Communication Services

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
XLE

-

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
XLE

-

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
XLE

-

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
XLE

-

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
XLE

-

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
XLE

-

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

XLE

-

Energy

FDIS

-

XLE
100.0%

Utilities

FDIS

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

3.10

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

8.63

-6.40

FDIS vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-71.26%

+32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-12.05%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-20.14%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-26.04%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-66.81%

+27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-8.01%

+3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-17.97%

+10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

4.32%

+0.69%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 6.19%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

7.26%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

16.79%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

20.57%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

26.05%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

29.58%

-7.26%

FDIS vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDIS and XLE have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and XLE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 9.91% for XLE. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS and XLE have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer