FDIS vs. RTH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).

FDIS and RTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIS is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both FDIS and RTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FDIS vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDIS vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-8.53%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.56%	12.36%	20.02%	20.07%	-17.67%	24.94%	31.62%	29.06%	3.87%	22.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 12.66%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.

FDIS

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -8.53%
• 6M: -9.00%
• 1Y: 11.19%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 12.66%

RTH

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 12.20%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: 13.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

RTH

VanEck Vectors Retail ETF

FDIS

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 30
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 54
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDIS	RTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.83	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	1.34	-0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.17	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	1.49	-0.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.36	5.80	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDIS vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and RTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDIS	RTH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	0.83	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.58	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.78	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.50	+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and RTH is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FDIS vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than RTH's 0.96% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.79%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.96%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum RTH drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and RTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	RTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-42.32%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-9.02%	-6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	-25.00%	-14.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-25.00%	-14.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.73%	-5.86%	-6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-7.38%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	2.32%	+2.37%

Volatility

FDIS vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.49%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	RTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	4.49%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	8.84%	+5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.22%	14.78%	+9.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.82%	16.75%	+7.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	17.53%	+4.69%