RTH vs. FSRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX).
RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. FSRPX is managed by Fidelity Investments. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTH or FSRPX.
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and FSRPX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RTH vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RTH:
0.80
FSRPX:
-0.06
RTH:
1.24
FSRPX:
0.06
RTH:
1.15
FSRPX:
1.01
RTH:
0.94
FSRPX:
-0.03
RTH:
3.42
FSRPX:
-0.16
RTH:
3.81%
FSRPX:
8.03%
RTH:
16.36%
FSRPX:
21.22%
RTH:
-41.79%
FSRPX:
-55.00%
RTH:
-7.19%
FSRPX:
-31.10%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than FSRPX's -8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 12.90%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.
RTH
0.32%
-1.50%
4.30%
12.85%
14.25%
12.90%
FSRPX
-8.70%
-2.76%
-7.37%
-1.31%
2.95%
7.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTH vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTH vs. FSRPX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RTH
FSRPX
RTH vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RTH vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than FSRPX's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.77% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 4.54% | 0.13% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.14% | 1.32% | 4.06% |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, smaller than the maximum FSRPX drawdown of -55.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and FSRPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RTH vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 10.09%, while Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.