RTH vs. FSRPX

In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSRPX's -2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 13.19%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the FSRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTH and FSRPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than FSRPX's 10.58% yield.

The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -41.79%, smaller than the maximum FSRPX drawdown of -55.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and FSRPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) is 5.28%, while Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that RTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.