RTH vs. FSRPX
RTH (VanEck Retail ETF) and FSRPX (Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RTH returned 14.09%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for FSRPX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RTH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for FSRPX.
Performance
RTH vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than FSRPX's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 14.09%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.92% annualized return.
RTH
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.86%
FSRPX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- -3.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.33M | $1.20M | $1.33M |
RTH vs. FSRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 7.50% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 4.39% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and FSRPX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RTH and FSRPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTH vs. FSRPX — Risk / Return Rank
RTH
FSRPX
RTH vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTH | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | -0.31 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | -0.64 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTH vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, smaller than the maximum FSRPX drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and FSRPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTH | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -55.75% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -17.79% | +9.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -22.58% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.00% | -39.01% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.00% | -39.01% | +14.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -9.32% | +8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -9.09% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 8.54% | -5.71% |
Volatility
RTH vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) at 4.65%. This indicates that RTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTH | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 4.65% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 12.28% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 19.96% | -6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 22.81% | -5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 21.65% | -4.03% |
RTH vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTH vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FSRPX's 6.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 6.57% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 0.90% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTH and FSRPX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTH has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FSRPX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTH dropped -42.32% vs FSRPX's -55.75%.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTH and FSRPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer