RTH vs. FSTA
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA).
RTH and FSTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. FSTA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both RTH and FSTA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RTH or FSTA.
Performance
RTH vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTH achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than FSTA's 16.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RTH has outperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 13.74%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.
RTH
18.28%
2.06%
12.35%
26.38%
14.38%
13.74%
FSTA
16.13%
0.53%
7.60%
20.74%
9.56%
8.46%
Key characteristics
| RTH | FSTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.31 | 2.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.20 | 3.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.10 | 2.70 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.35 | 14.02 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.95% | 1.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.93% | 10.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.80% | -25.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.56% | -0.98% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTH vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between RTH and FSTA is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RTH vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RTH vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FSTA's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% | 1.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.37% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 0.45% |
Drawdowns
RTH vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTH drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTH and FSTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RTH vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) at 3.01%. This indicates that RTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.