FDIS vs. FHLC

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.98%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for FHLC. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

FDIS vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 13.98%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.

FDIS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 0.01%
• 6M: -1.14%
• 1Y: 12.39%
• 3Y*: 13.37%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 13.98%

FHLC

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 5.86%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.01%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	0.03%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and FHLC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FDIS and FHLC has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDIS vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIS	FHLC
Consumer Cyclical	96.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Technology	1.0%	0.0%
Industrials	0.9%	0.0%
Communication Services	0.3%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	99.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 20
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 34
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDIS	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	1.09	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.72	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.19	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	1.55	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.24	3.86	-1.62

FDIS vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-28.76%	-10.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-10.38%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	-16.87%	-10.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	-17.73%	-21.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	-28.76%	-10.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.58%	-3.15%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-5.19%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	4.16%	+0.85%

Volatility

FDIS vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.87%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	4.87%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	10.50%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	14.69%	+3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.92%	15.02%	+8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.32%	16.84%	+5.48%

FDIS vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDIS and FHLC have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDIS vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than FHLC's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.73%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.37%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and FHLC in my portfolio?

FDIS and FHLC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIS or FHLC?

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to FHLC (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which ETF is better, FDIS or FHLC?

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 9.76% for FHLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIS or FHLC?

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIS or FHLC?

FDIS and FHLC have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIS or FHLC?

FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

What is the main difference between FDIS and FHLC?

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FHLC is Health & Biotech Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.