PortfoliosLab logo
FHLC vs. FSPHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and FSPHX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

FHLC vs. FSPHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
205.30%
67.12%
FHLC
FSPHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FHLC:

-0.08

FSPHX:

-0.52

Sortino Ratio

FHLC:

-0.01

FSPHX:

-0.59

Omega Ratio

FHLC:

1.00

FSPHX:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

FHLC:

-0.07

FSPHX:

-0.30

Martin Ratio

FHLC:

-0.19

FSPHX:

-1.02

Ulcer Index

FHLC:

5.94%

FSPHX:

9.14%

Daily Std Dev

FHLC:

14.66%

FSPHX:

18.03%

Max Drawdown

FHLC:

-28.76%

FSPHX:

-43.87%

Current Drawdown

FHLC:

-11.72%

FSPHX:

-27.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than FSPHX's -5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has outperformed FSPHX with an annualized return of 7.86%, while FSPHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.04% annualized return.


FHLC

YTD

-0.46%

1M

-4.55%

6M

-7.15%

1Y

-0.01%

5Y*

7.27%

10Y*

7.86%

FSPHX

YTD

-5.65%

1M

-6.00%

6M

-16.57%

1Y

-8.91%

5Y*

-1.80%

10Y*

1.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FHLC vs. FSPHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPHX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FSPHX: current value is 0.69%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FSPHX: 0.69%
Expense ratio chart for FHLC: current value is 0.08%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FHLC: 0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FHLC vs. FSPHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FHLC is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSPHX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSPHX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSPHX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSPHX is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSPHX is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSPHX is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FHLC vs. FSPHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FHLC, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FHLC: -0.08
FSPHX: -0.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for FHLC, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FHLC: -0.01
FSPHX: -0.59
The chart of Omega ratio for FHLC, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FHLC: 1.00
FSPHX: 0.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for FHLC, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FHLC: -0.07
FSPHX: -0.30
The chart of Martin ratio for FHLC, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FHLC: -0.19
FSPHX: -1.02

The current FHLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the FSPHX Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLC and FSPHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.08
-0.52
FHLC
FSPHX

Dividends

FHLC vs. FSPHX - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than FSPHX's 0.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.55%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%2.14%1.38%1.40%2.07%1.03%
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.58%0.11%0.15%0.17%0.13%4.61%4.79%

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. FSPHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum FSPHX drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and FSPHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.72%
-27.30%
FHLC
FSPHX

Volatility

FHLC vs. FSPHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 9.43%, while Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.43%
9.99%
FHLC
FSPHX