FHLC vs. FSHCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX).
FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. FSHCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -4.97% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio | -13.20% | 3.85% | -13.21% | 1.52% | 0.86% | 20.22% | 18.58% | 19.91% | 10.17% | 24.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly higher than FSHCX's -13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has outperformed FSHCX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while FSHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.
FHLC
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
FSHCX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -13.20%
- 6M
- -12.00%
- 1Y
- -21.02%
- 3Y*
- -5.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHCX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHLC vs. FSHCX — Risk / Return Rank
FHLC
FSHCX
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLC | FSHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | -0.89 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | -1.05 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.85 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | -0.73 | +1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | -1.29 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLC | FSHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | -0.89 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | -0.11 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLC and FSHCX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Dividend Comparison
FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than FSHCX's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio | 0.87% | 0.75% | 16.63% | 0.57% | 5.32% | 7.09% | 0.76% | 0.27% | 12.92% | 13.41% | 4.62% | 4.06% |
Drawdowns
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum FSHCX drawdown of -57.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and FSHCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLC | FSHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -57.81% | +29.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -28.32% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -29.52% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.76% | -35.48% | +6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.99% | -25.72% | +17.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -11.36% | +6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.04% | 15.92% | -10.88% |
Volatility
FHLC vs. FSHCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) at 4.32%. This indicates that FHLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHLC | FSHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 4.32% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 14.42% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 23.02% | -5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 18.96% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 21.40% | -4.58% |