FDIS vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FDIS is passively managed, while FELG is actively managed. Over the past year, FDIS returned 9.82% vs 27.58% for FELG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELG.

Performance

FDIS vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FELG's 7.70% return.

FDIS

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: -0.65%
• 6M: -0.87%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-0.65%	5.67%	24.43%	7.90%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and FELG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.75

The correlation between FDIS and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. FELG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIS	FELG
Consumer Cyclical	96.9%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	1.0%
Technology	0.9%	53.9%
Industrials	0.8%	7.2%
Communication Services	0.2%	13.8%
Healthcare	0.1%	6.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	4.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Energy	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 17
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDIS	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.79	-1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	2.45	-1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.31	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.71	-1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.00	5.86	-3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDIS vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDIS	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	1.79	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	1.32	-0.72

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-23.89%	-15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-16.17%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.22%	-1.34%	-3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-3.52%	-3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	4.72%	+0.21%

Volatility

FDIS vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) at 3.50%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	3.50%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.06%	11.59%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	15.46%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.87%	19.89%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.29%	19.89%	+2.40%

FDIS vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDIS vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than FELG's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.73%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and FELG in my portfolio?

FDIS and FELG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIS or FELG?

FDIS has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FELG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, FDIS or FELG?

On 1-year performance, FELG leads with 27.58% vs 9.82% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FELG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIS or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, FELG has performed better with a 27.58% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIS or FELG?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIS or FELG?

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.

What is the main difference between FDIS and FELG?

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.18% for FELG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.