PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. FDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. FDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FDMO's 15.24% return.


FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%

FDMO

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.12%
YTD
15.24%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. FDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.65%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
15.24%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and FDMO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.81

The correlation between FDIS and FDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. FDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
FDMO

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.0%

Technology

0.9%
35.7%

Industrials

0.8%
10.1%

Communication Services

0.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.8%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
FDMO
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
FDMO
4.0%

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
FDMO
35.7%

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
FDMO
10.1%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
FDMO
9.8%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
FDMO
8.8%

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
FDMO
11.7%

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
FDMO
2.0%

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

FDMO
2.0%

Energy

FDIS

-

FDMO
3.5%

Utilities

FDIS

-

FDMO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. FDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. FDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISFDMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

2.01

-1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

2.74

-1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.35

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.71

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.00

10.79

-8.79

FDIS vs. FDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FDMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and FDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISFDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.01

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.87

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.82

-0.21

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. FDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than FDMO's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISFDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-33.94%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-12.22%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-21.88%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-25.44%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-0.32%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-5.42%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

3.06%

+1.87%

Volatility

FDIS vs. FDMO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) at 4.82%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISFDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.82%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

13.11%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

16.50%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

19.00%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

19.51%

+2.78%

FDIS vs. FDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDMO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIS vs. FDMO - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than FDMO's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and FDMO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to FDMO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FDMO's -33.94%.

On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 16.35% vs 6.19% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDMO.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FDMO is Momentum. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.29% for FDMO.

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and FDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer