FDMO vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FDMO and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDMO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both FDMO and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDMO or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| FDMO | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.13% | 9.30% |
| 1Y Return | 30.74% | 38.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.65% | 9.34% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.98% | 17.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.45 | 2.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.35% | 15.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.94% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.91% | -2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and SCHG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDMO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 9.30% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDMO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDMO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than SCHG's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.69% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.44% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDMO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 4.76%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.