FDMO vs. FMTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. FDMO is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, FDMO returned 32.96% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

FDMO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.

FDMO

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 6M: 14.87%
• 1Y: 32.96%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: —

FMTM

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 34.74%
• 1Y: 63.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	15.24%	28.20%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	31.75%	27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and FMTM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.73

The correlation between FDMO and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDMO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 57
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDMO	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.80	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.43	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.46	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	5.28	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.79	20.62	-9.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDMO vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDMO	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.80	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	2.38	-1.56

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMO	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-12.12%	-21.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-12.12%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	0.00%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-1.89%	-3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	3.10%	-0.04%

Volatility

FDMO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 4.82%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMO	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	6.52%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.11%	17.83%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.50%	22.82%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.00%	22.94%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	22.94%	-3.43%

FDMO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.56%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMO and FMTM in my portfolio?

FDMO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMO or FMTM?

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to FDMO (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, FDMO or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 32.96% for FDMO. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDMO or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 32.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDMO or FMTM?

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDMO or FMTM?

FDMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between FDMO and FMTM?

Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.