FDIS vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FDIS is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDIS returned 5.16%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for FBCG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FDIS vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 10.08% return.

FDIS

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -2.85%
• YTD: -2.36%
• 6M: -4.54%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 5.16%
• 10Y*: 13.88%

FBCG

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 31.50%
• 3Y*: 27.58%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-2.36%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	40.60%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	10.08%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	41.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and FBCG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.85

The correlation between FDIS and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDIS	FBCG
Consumer Cyclical	96.7%	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	1.3%
Technology	1.0%	48.9%
Industrials	0.9%	5.6%
Communication Services	0.3%	17.1%
Healthcare	0.1%	5.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.1%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Energy	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

FDIS vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 15
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 46
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDIS	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.59	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	2.17	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.28	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	2.09	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	7.85	-6.26

FDIS vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIS	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.16%	-43.56%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-15.17%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.43%	-27.89%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.16%	-43.56%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.85%	-5.76%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-11.42%	+3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	4.02%	+1.05%

Volatility

FDIS vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 6.34%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIS	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.34%	8.27%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.82%	15.50%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.75%	19.84%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.99%	26.00%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	25.80%	-3.47%

FDIS vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDIS vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.75%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIS and FBCG in my portfolio?

FDIS and FBCG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIS or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to FDIS (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, FDIS or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 13.39% vs 5.16% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIS or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIS or FBCG?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIS or FBCG?

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FDIS and FBCG?

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.