FBCG vs. FTEC
FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. FBCG is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCG returned 13.39%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBCG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
FBCG vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return.
FBCG
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
FBCG vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 10.08% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 41.44% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 23.56% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 33.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCG and FTEC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FBCG and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FBCG vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBCG
FTEC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
Technology
FBCG
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
FBCG
FTEC
Communication Services
FBCG
FTEC
Industrials
FBCG
FTEC
Healthcare
FBCG
FTEC
-
Financial Services
FBCG
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
FBCG
FTEC
-
Real Estate
FBCG
FTEC
-
Basic Materials
FBCG
FTEC
Utilities
FBCG
FTEC
-
Energy
FBCG
FTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCG vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FBCG
FTEC
FBCG vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.94 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 9.03 | -1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCG vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -34.95% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -16.26% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | -27.30% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | -34.95% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -7.72% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.42% | -5.57% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 5.28% | -1.26% |
Volatility
FBCG vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 8.27%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 11.42% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.50% | 18.65% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 22.79% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.00% | 25.60% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 24.86% | +0.94% |
FBCG vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCG vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FBCG and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to FBCG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 19.77% vs 13.39% for FBCG. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FBCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FBCG and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCG and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer