PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCG vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCG vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return.


FBCG

1D
-2.80%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.15%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-3.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
23.56%
6M
21.69%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
30.58%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
25.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCG vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
10.08%18.60%39.05%57.98%-39.10%21.34%41.44%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.56%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%33.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCG and FTEC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.94

The correlation between FBCG and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBCG vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBCG
FTEC

Technology

48.9%
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

17.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

17.1%
0.0%

Industrials

5.6%
0.6%

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Financial Services

2.2%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.0%

Utilities

0.5%

-

Energy

0.4%
0.3%

Technology

FBCG
48.9%
FTEC
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FBCG
17.2%
FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

FBCG
17.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Industrials

FBCG
5.6%
FTEC
0.6%

Healthcare

FBCG
5.6%
FTEC

-

Financial Services

FBCG
2.2%
FTEC
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

FBCG
1.3%
FTEC

-

Real Estate

FBCG
0.6%
FTEC

-

Basic Materials

FBCG
0.5%
FTEC
0.0%

Utilities

FBCG
0.5%
FTEC

-

Energy

FBCG
0.4%
FTEC
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCG vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCG vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBCGFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.94

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

9.03

-1.17

FBCG vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCG and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBCG vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCGFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-34.95%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-16.26%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.89%

-27.30%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

-34.95%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-7.72%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.42%

-5.57%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

5.28%

-1.26%

Volatility

FBCG vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 8.27%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCGFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

11.42%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.50%

18.65%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

22.79%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.00%

25.60%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

24.86%

+0.94%

FBCG vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCG vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FBCG and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to FBCG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 19.77% vs 13.39% for FBCG. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

FBCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FBCG and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCG and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer