FDAT vs. EAOA
FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FDAT is actively managed, while EAOA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDAT returned 8.93%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for EAOA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.
Performance
FDAT vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 8.38% return.
FDAT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FDAT vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 3.43% | 7.50% | 9.90% | 5.90% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 8.38% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 10.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAT and EAOA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FDAT and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDAT vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
FDAT
EAOA
FDAT vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDAT | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.50 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 10.79 | -5.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDAT vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAT | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -25.06% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -8.17% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.20% | -13.84% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -2.11% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -5.27% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.89% | +0.26% |
Volatility
FDAT vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) is 3.83%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FDAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDAT | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 4.63% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 9.50% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 11.42% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 13.36% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 13.19% | -3.59% |
FDAT vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDAT vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than EAOA's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% |
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 5.94% | 4.77% | 8.99% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDAT and EAOA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOA has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FDAT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDAT dropped -8.20% vs EAOA's -25.06%.
On 3-year performance, EAOA leads with 16.43% vs 8.93% for FDAT. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FDAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 16.43% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FDAT.
FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.94%, compared with 1.98% for EAOA.
They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.18% for EAOA.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDAT and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer